Michael Gavin Williams

Michael Gavin WilliamsMichael Gavin WilliamsMichael Gavin Williams

Michael Gavin Williams

Michael Gavin WilliamsMichael Gavin WilliamsMichael Gavin Williams

Defending My Rights with Confidence

Defending My Rights with ConfidenceDefending My Rights with ConfidenceDefending My Rights with Confidence

This blog is my self-defence against the crimes and legal abuse committed against me by Michael Gavin Williams

Preamble Regarding Michael Gavin Williams

The Fratricidal Madness of Michael Gavin Williams

Michael Gavin Williams is my brother, a fact that is unfortunate as it is immutable. For at least 30 years, Michael has been on a constant, escalating campaign of defamation against me, his only flesh and blood brother. 


Michael uses a specific pattern to disburse his fratricidal rage and hatred of my person. He attacks me in a manner that is cowardly and covert, operating from the shadows. Michael instigates conflict, then escalates it to a boiling point where I am obligated to respond in self-defence. Michael then points to my reaction of self-defence and accuses me of being the aggressor. By doing this, he gains the false and misled sympathies of others, conscripting them into his campaign of fratricidal rage.


By the time others realise Michael's rouse and game, it is too late. They have dedicated themselves to a myopic, one-sided narrative on Michael's behalf, where Michael pretends to be an innocent, poor victim of his big bad brother's anger. Nothing could be further from the truth. Others, such as Abbie Ellis of the Cambridgeshire Constabulary, fear being seen as duped by Michael's theatrics. Thus they feel further emboldened and obligated to double down on their support for Michael's lies, making Michael's pernicious and diminutive pattern of fake victimhood into the ultimate mind virus.


It is hard to explain why Michael behaves this way. To my knowledge, the only mistake I have made that caused him distress was an insensitive comment on FaceBook about his infant colic. Additionally, I believe Michael blames me for an incident in his past, where he was violated by a stranger while Michael was in the midst of drug seeking behaviour.


Michael has abused psilocybin mushrooms for many years. His chosen family, including Danielle Ayal, are now invested in a pseudo-shamanic cult that indulges in Ayahuasca on a regular basis as a form of quasi-religious, entheogenic, holier-than-thou exploration of hallucinogens.


Today, Michael Gavin Williams is my cyberstalker. He has collected, hoarded and manufactured a cache of extortion and blackmail material against me. Michael routinely transmits his falsified and partially fabricated cache of my alleged wrongdoings to my employers and the places where I live. As a result, I have no privacy or security whereever I live or work. I left the United States to gain distance from his strategic legal abuse, but he follows me digitally as well across oceans. Senior members of law enforcement such as Nick Dean, Chief Constable of Cambridgeshire, will not help me or listen to me because Michael uses his wife and child as a shield to amplify his victimhood.


This blog post is the only defence I have against the unrelenting cyberstalking and random attacks by Michael Gavin Williams against my safety and livelihood. I am no longer able to share where I work or where I live, as Michael routinely tracks me and recruits others into his fratricidal vendetta using alarmist theatrics, weasel words and outright lies. 


It is my hope and prayer that sunlight, being the best disinfectant, will motivate Michael to stop his campaign of extreme hatred against my person, and stop his decades long pursuit of my downfall and annihilation. 

Michael Gavin Williams Hires Freelancers to Cyberstalk Me

The Exploits of a Cyber Criminal

Michael Gavin Williams hires eastern European and other economically disenfranchised individuals in order to cyberstalk and track my location. He pays these freelancers to deface my LinkedIn as well.


Here, we see Kenan Causevic, a freelancer from Bosnia, paid by Michael Gavin Williams in order to deface my LinkedIn posts. 


Additionally, Michael Gavin Williams impersonates law enforcement and official court communication from a ProtonMail with the name "Martin Averill". 

Michael Gavin Williams: False Accuser And Legal Abuser

Evading Legal Process by Pretending to be a Victim

Michael Gavin Williams is a profound coward. He weaponizes his legal education not to uphold justice, but to evade accountability, all while posturing as a victim.


This image was taken by a NAPPS-certified process server during an attempt to serve Michael with a summons in a defamation lawsuit I filed against him. Instead of facing the consequences of his repeated lies, Michael went into hiding—slithering like a petty serpent within the walls of his Eichler home nestled in the hills of San Bruno, Silicon Valley.


For one fleeting moment, necessity drew him from his hole. He emerged briefly to retrieve something from his wife's Tesla Model Y—then scurried back indoors, into the comfort of a house purchased not by earned merit, but gifted by his boomer mother. The process server wasn’t able to deliver the summons during this brief cowardly excursion—but he did capture this image.


This photo forms part of a lawful service attempt, executed under civil procedure by a certified professional. Yet Michael now claims—laughably and falsely—that the photo is an act of “stalking.” In truth, this is classic Michael: a pathological liar who deflects blame by fabricating victimhood. He commits abuse, then projects it onto his target—in this case, me.


Michael Gavin Williams equates lawful service with harassment, all while cloaking himself in the language of victimhood. But the facts are simple: Michael is the stalker. He has been cyberstalking me for years, attacking from behind VPNs, ProtonMail aliases, and pseudonyms with a consistency that only the truly obsessed can sustain.


Recently, I was informed that Michael no longer resides at that address. Perhaps his pothead wife, Danielle Bromberg, finally came to her senses—realizing she married a selfish, cowardly narcissist with a martyr complex and a vindictive streak, and chose the only rational exit: divorce.

Michael Gavin Williams is a Malicious Cyberstalker

A Statement of Self-Defence

This blog post shares the truth that Michael Gavin Williams has been violating my civil and human rights while pretending to be a victim. 


Michael Gavin Williams is engaging in deeply damaging lawfare and personal attacks against me. If you are readng this, it is likely because he has tried to communicate with you to defame me. By reading this blog post, you will see the true nature of Michael Gavin Williams' behaviour.


This blog is not meant to harass or cause distress. It is the only defence I have against the highly aggressive legal abuse I continue to suffer at the hands of Michael Gavin Williams.

Michael is the Aggressor, Not the Victim

Contrary to his claims of minimal contact and victimisation, Michaels own emails and communications demonstrate that he was the primary instigator and escalator of this conflict. The assertion that I engaged in harassment or stalking is categorically false, and the available evidence proves that Michael initiated, maintained, and escalated our interactions, weaponizing legal mechanisms to distort the truth.


1. Michael Gavin Williams Initiated the Conflict


Michael’s own emails reveal that:


  • He chose to engage and escalate interactions, rather than blocking communication or seeking de-escalation.


  • He falsely accused me of criminal behaviour in a defamatory email, launching an unprovoked attack against my character.


  • His claims of fear and distress are inconsistent with his active participation in prolonged email exchanges.


2. Michael’s Actions Were Malicious and Intended to Provoke


A review of his communications shows a pattern of:


  • Taunting, belittling, and sarcastic rhetoric, designed to provoke emotional responses.


  • Contradictions in his statements, where he first dismisses my concerns, then later fabricates claims of harassment.


  • Engagement in back-channel communications to manipulate third parties into taking action against me.


3. Michael Williams Is Not the Victim, but the Aggressor


The reality is that he has used false allegations as a tool for:


  • Character assassination and defamation, portraying me as a threat when he was the one instigating conflict.


  • Leveraging legal mechanisms to silence me, rather than resolving matters in good faith.


  • Coordinating with third parties to escalate legal and social consequences against me.

The Emails of Michael Gavin William

Email 1: Michael Williams’ Aggressive Provocation and False Narrative of Victimhood

--------------------------------------------------------------------

This email from Michael Gavin Williams, which he deliberately omitted from his submissions to the Cambridgeshire Constabulary, exposes his role as the true instigator and escalator of this conflict. Rather than a neutral party attempting to disengage, Michael’s own words demonstrate a calculated effort to provoke, defame, and distort events, all while portraying himself as a victim. His hostile, accusatory, and inflammatory tone contradicts any claim that he sought to avoid conflict. Had this email been included in his police statements, it would have revealed his active participation in escalating tensions, fabricating allegations, and weaponizing the criminal justice system.

  

From: Michael Williams mgw@ucla.edu

Date: Thursday, November 2, 2023 at 12:45 AM

To: The Author thauthor@michaelgavinwilliams.com

Cc: Alex Ayal alexayal@tutamail.com, Lyn Ayal lynayal@gmail.com, Steve Ayal steveayal@hotmail.com, David Gordon david.gordon.reno@gmail.com, Kirk Rader kirk@rader.us

Subject: Re: Reflections on Family Dynamics and Our Shared Path Forward


I'm not on many of these emails so I'm not sure what you intended for me to see or not see.  But you will leave my wife and her family out of it.  I can't conceive of any plausible purpose you have in quoting something you think my wife said and including her mother and sister, other than to provoke and harass my family.  They want no part of it.  Leave them out of it. 


In the spirit of accountability:

There may be emotional distance and communication issues in our family, like many families.  Many people have issues and grievances with family and upbringing. There are lots of healthy and unhealthy ways to address them.  


But you are right, it is different with you.  Not because of whatever Lyn's Great Financial Conspiracy And Stuff you came up with this time.  It's because you behave differently.  You have repeatedly handled difficult family issues and painful feelings with raw viciousness, by reaching out to random people to talk shit about us, by ranting about it on social media, and with scary manic episodes.  You did that to me in 2015.  You did that about mom in 2017 in countless emails and when you called Steve to tell him she is an awful liar and he should divorce her.  Before that you did it publicly about our father, after he was dead but while he was still *the source of all your problems* before it turned to me and then to mom--remember that?  And then it was Danny's turn 2 years ago when you didn't like something they put on instagram about Emma.  Have you spoken a single word to Danny since then? 


And that one was before or after you got arrested for hurting Emma?  Did she get a restraining order against you?  That was the second or third restraining order women have taken out against you, after Carrie? Also that was after your theft charges from Rand but before your DUI right? 

I don't know anyone else who acts like this.  Do you?  That's a genuine question I hope you have the integrity to consider honestly.  I know you don't like to think of yourself in these terms but these are all things you did.  Accountability.  


And here we are with a new one.  This time with my in-laws copied, thanks for that.  When you reach for the Balfour Declaration From 1917 and Lyn Ayal's Terrible Evil Emotional Manipulation in the same breath you sound manic.  You've proven to me many times that in that manic state, anything we've ever shared with you, confided in you, struggled with in front of you is fair game for you to use to try to hurt us.  It doesn't matter if you are right or wrong about anything you say about mom here.  When you act  like this you are the danger and I need to protect my family from you.  Remember when you told 5000 strangers on facebook that I'm a disgusting meat eater and it figures because I had colic as a baby and wasn't close to my mother growing up?  Yeah I remember that too. 


Are you accountable for that?  Saying there are "misunderstandings and disagreements about your behavior" is preposterously euphemistic and childishly avoidant.  The reality is a lot simpler, you just don't like the words.  You are not a safe person.  You are not a sane person.  I don't trust you.  You are dangerous.  We are not safe from you.   That's why you have never met my son.  I have absolutely no doubt you would try to inject the same poison into him the next time you get mad at me.  Which is inevitable. 


You are distant from your family because you've tried to knife us so many times.  Accountability.


I'm not sure what you hope to get out of your family with these messages.  But I think you will not get it as long as your approach to difficult emotions and complicated family dynamics continues to be arson by email.  And you will not get it before you are able, through medication, through therapy, through hospitalization, through I don't know what to handle these normal human challenges without turning them into an unhinged Grand Theory of Lyn Ayal As Satan And Other Things email string.  You need professional help. 


I hope you find peace.  It will not involve me. 


Leave my family alone   

  

Michael’s omission of this email is a deliberate act of deception designed to present a one-sided, distorted narrative to the police. Instead of disengaging, he taunts, belittles, and makes sweeping defamatory claims—including false accusations of past criminal activity—without evidence. His insistence on framing me as "dangerous" while repeatedly engaging in hostile and inflammatory communication is a textbook example of gaslighting and manipulation.


By withholding this email from police submissions, Michael ensured that his own provocations, defamatory accusations, and escalation efforts remained hidden, thereby manufacturing a false image of victimhood. Had the police seen this, it is highly likely they would have reconsidered filing for a Stalking Protection Order, recognizing that Michael was not a victim, but rather the primary aggressor, using selective disclosure to manipulate law enforcement for his own retaliatory ends.


Email 2: Michael Williams’ Willing Engagement and Legal Threats—Contradicting His Claims of Fear

--------------------------------------------------------------------

This email, which Michael Williams intentionally omitted from his police submissions, directly contradicts his narrative that he was an unwilling victim of harassment. Instead of avoiding contact or expressing distress, Michael actively engages in legal discourse, provides instructions on how to serve him legal documents, and even issues his own legal threats under California Code of Civil Procedure § 128.5. His willingness to engage with a supposed "harasser" in a calm, calculated, and retaliatory manner demonstrates that he was neither fearful nor attempting to disengage.


Had Michael genuinely felt threatened or harassed, he would have simply blocked communication, refused to engage, or sought legal recourse without responding directly. His proactive participation in legal discussions and attempt to intimidate with legal counterclaims prove that he saw this as a legal dispute—not harassment.

  

From: Michael Williams mgw@ucla.edu

Date: Wednesday, November 15, 2023 at 2:30 PM

To: The Author thauthor@michaelgavinwilliams.com

Subject: Re: Notice of Upcoming Legal Filing Against Mr. Michael Williams

If you actually file a complaint you can serve me by email. I am not in San Francisco so I cannot accept personal service there. 

If you are responsible enough to get actual legal advice before trying this stunt, you will have been advised that you do not have a defamation claim. Know that if you decide to waste my time on this anyway, I will go after you for my fees and expenses. See CCP § 128.5.

Pretty much everyone else in our family has blocked you, so either way you don't need to go on with this mass email harassment. 

  

Michael deliberately withheld this email from the Cambridgeshire Constabulary because it exposes his willingness to communicate, his legal threats, and his true intentions to escalate the conflict. This email destroys his claim of being an unwilling victim of harassment, as he dictates terms of legal service, warns of counter-litigation, and demonstrates clear control over the interaction.


By omitting this crucial communication, Michael manipulated law enforcement by presenting a false, one-sided portrayal of distress and victimhood. Had the police seen this email, they would have recognized that Michael was not a victim of harassment, but an active participant in a legal and familial dispute that he chose to escalate for his own advantage.


Email 3: Michael Williams’ Willing Engagement and Instruction on Legal Service—Contradicting His Own Claims of Fear and Harassment

--------------------------------------------------------------------

This email, which Michael Williams deliberately omitted from his police submissions, further contradicts his claim that he was an unwilling victim of harassment. Rather than attempting to disengage or expressing distress, Michael openly invites communication, instructs on legal service procedures, and even sarcastically suggests using ChatGPT for legal guidance. His demeanour is neither fearful nor distressed—it is mocking, confrontational, and fully engaged in the dispute.


Michael states, "I’ve tried to communicate with you directly in order to spare the various people on this email who have asked you many times to stop including them." Yet, rather than blocking communication or seeking lawful recourse to prevent further contact, he continues engaging, dictates legal service terms, and escalates the dispute. This proves that he was not seeking to avoid contact but instead engaging willingly, thereby undermining any claim that he was being stalked or harassed.

  

From: Michael Williams <mgw@ucla.edu>

Date: Thursday, November 16, 2023 at 1:15 PM

To: The Author <thauthor@michaelgavinwilliams.com>, Kirk Rader <kirk@rader.us>, Lyn Ayal <lynayal@gmail.com>, Alex Ayal <alexayal@tutamail.com>, Steve Ayal <steveayal@hotmail.com>, steveayal@gmail.com <steveayal@gmail.com>, Danielle Williams <dewilliams83@gmail.com>, Victoria Bromberg <victoriabromberg@gmail.com>, Betty Bromberg <bettybromberg@yahoo.com>

Subject: Re: Legal Filing Update and Personal Reflections


I've tried to communicate with you directly in order to spare the various people on this email who have asked you many times to stop including them. But I guess you can't control yourself and won't engage with me directly so here we are. 


For the second time, I am telling you that I will accept service of your complaint by email. It's called service by notice and acknowledgement of receipt. You can ask chatgpt about it. Alternatively, you can serve me by mail at 851 Cherry Ave Ste 27, #1078, San Bruno, CA 94066. But either way you need to send me the version file stamped by the court, and the summons, not just the chatgpt output.

 

I've now provided you two different methods to serve me, and your continued references to finding out "Michael Williams's [sic] residential address, which he shares with Mrs. Danielle Williams and their son" are yet another attempt to intimidate us and a not very veiled threat to my family. This will not reflect well on you in court, either in your "defamation" action or in our separate action for a restraining order against you. 


In any event, are you really not aware that there are records of these things? Here are a few 


1. Police report on "Grand Theft/Fraud". Rand accused you of grand theft and the Santa Moncia PD agreed. I wouldn't know what you were later convicted of and I didn't claim to know.

 

2. Booking record of your arrest for "243(E)(1) - BAT:SPOUSE/EX SP/DATE/ET". Penal code section 243(E) is battery against a domestic partner. So "you were arrested for hurting Emma" is true whether or not you dispute having hurt Emma.

 

3. Email from you on May 12, 2015: "I am also in substance abuse classes for my DUI." Enough said.

 

4. Email from you on May 12, 2015: "Sure, I am probably fucked up and crazy and untrustworthy" You'll forgive me for taking you at your word.

 

I guess we'll discuss these and the rest in open court. Did your lawyer chatgpt also advise you that by putting your mental health at issue in a defamation claim, you have waived all privilege and confidentiality in your mental health records? When will your therapist(s) be available for depositions? When are you sending me your medical records and medication history? My address is above. Or email is fine. 


And again, after your claim fails on the merits I will ask the court to award me fees and expenses from you under CCP § 128.5. So I'm tracking my time on this. My most recent billing rate at Morrison Foerster before going in house was $1,015 an hour. 

 

Michael chose to omit this email from his police submission because it exposes his active role in the conflict, contradicting his false claims of victimhood. His direct instructions on how to serve legal documents, sarcastic tone, and continued participation in communication clearly show that he was not a reluctant, distressed victim but an active participant in escalating this legal and personal dispute.


By intentionally misrepresenting the nature of these interactions, Michael weaponized the criminal justice system to paint a false narrative of one-sided harassment. Had the Cambridgeshire Constabulary seen this email, they would have recognized that Michael was never in fear or distress, but instead actively escalating the conflict while selectively withholding evidence to manipulate law enforcement for retaliatory purposes.


Email 4: Michael Williams’ Dismissive and Obstructive Behaviour—Contradicting His Alleged Fear and Victimhood

--------------------------------------------------------------------

This email, which Michael Williams intentionally omitted from his police submissions, further proves that he was not a victim of harassment but an active, willing participant in escalating this conflict. Rather than disengaging, blocking communication, or seeking immediate legal relief, Michael directly engages in legal strategy, taunts me, and obstructs transparency regarding critical records.


In this email, Michael:


  • Flatly refuses a reasonable request for transparency ("Request denied")—demonstrating a hostile and confrontational stance, rather than fear.


  • Engages in legal posturing, citing California procedural laws (CCP § 436) to dismiss aspects of my claim, showing his willingness to battle in court rather  than disengage.


  • Mentions historical police reports, offering to scan and send records—a contradiction of any claim that he was avoiding contact or under distress.


  • Attempts to control information flow, refusing to provide Danny Ayal’s contact information under the guise of protecting them.


Had Michael truly been fearful, he would have cut off communication entirely, refused to engage, and sought protection without continuing to provoke legal arguments. Instead, his eagerness to cite legal statutes, discuss past cases, and maintain a power dynamic over access to information reveals that he was not a victim, but a strategic manipulator of the legal system.

  

From: Michael Williams <mgw@ucla.edu>
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2023 3:27:57 PM
To: The Author <thauthor@michaelgavinwilliams.com>
Cc: Kirk Rader <kirk@rader.us>; Lyn Ayal <lynayal@gmail.com>; Alex Ayal <alexayal@tutamail.com>; Steve Ayal <steveayal@hotmail.com>; steveayal@gmail.com <steveayal@gmail.com>; Danielle Williams <dewilliams83@gmail.com>; Victoria Bromberg <victoriabromberg@gmail.com>; Betty Bromberg <bettybromberg@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Request for Transparency and Preservation of Records


Request denied.  None of the stuff you put in your complaint about Danny will survive my motion to strike under CCP 436 because it is relevant to your "defamation" claim.  I'm sure you're already familiar from your diligent legal research, but see below.  In any event Danny wants nothing to do with you, has blocked you, and doesn't want us to provide you their current contact information.  The email you have for Danny doesn't work.  


The police report on Grand Theft/Fraud was written by Detective Daniel Larios of the Santa Monica PD.  Looks like he's still there, you should call him.  He said you lied to him and then ducked his calls in 2007.  There's a lot more to it after the first page, I'll have to scan it for you.  


436. The court may, upon a motion made pursuant to Section 435, or at any time in its discretion, and upon terms it deems proper:


(a) Strike out any irrelevant, false, or improper matter inserted in any pleading.


(b) Strike out all or any part of any pleading not drawn or filed in conformity with the laws of this state, a court rule, or an order of the court.


(Amended by Stats. 1983, Ch. 1167, Sec. 4.)

  

Michael’s omission of this email from his police submission was a deliberate act of deception, designed to mislead law enforcement into believing that he was being relentlessly pursued, when in reality, he was fully engaged in the conflict, issuing legal threats, and selectively controlling access to key records. His dismissive and sarcastic tone, coupled with his willingness to engage in detailed legal arguments, directly contradicts any claim of harassment, intimidation, or fear.


By withholding this email, Michael deprived the Cambridgeshire Constabulary of critical evidence that would have exposed his willingness to provoke, escalate, and manipulate legal procedures. Had this email been included in his submissions, it is highly likely the police would have recognized his role as an active participant in this dispute, rather than an innocent victim, and dismissed the Stalking Protection Order application accordingly.


Email 5: Michael Williams’ Willing Engagement and Threats of Legal Retaliation—Exposing His True Role as an Aggressor

--------------------------------------------------------------------

This email, which Michael Williams intentionally omitted from his police submissions, further proves that he was not a fearful victim of harassment, but rather an active participant and instigator in the conflict. Instead of disengaging or blocking communication, Michael openly taunts, ridicules, and threatens legal retaliation—contradicting any claim that he was being stalked or harassed.


In this email, Michael:


· Mocks and belittles past communications, using sarcastic and accusatory language to provoke a reaction ("Are you delusional enough to forget that you did this, or are you just gaslighting?")


· Openly threatens to use past messages as evidence, demonstrating a clear intent to escalate legal conflict rather than disengage.


· States his willingness to continue the back-and-forth indefinitely, contradicting any notion that he felt harassed or in distress ("We can keep doing this as long as you want.").


Had Michael truly been fearful or feeling harassed, he would have ceased communication entirely, sought a protective order without engagement, or blocked further contact. Instead, his tone and content show that he actively wanted to escalate the dispute, weaponize past communications, and prolong the conflict for strategic legal advantage.

  

On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 8:19 PM Michael Williams <mgw@ucla.edu> wrote:

I believe Danny is reflecting equally on your more recent actions, like this birthday text you sent Danny last year. When you appeal to disney movies, are you delusional enough to forget that you did this, or are you just gaslighting? You also realize that things like this will be relevant in a court case where you have put your safety and sanity directly at issue, right? Glad you are so committed to truth and justice so we can surface more of this in the discovery phase of your lawsuit. 


We can keep doing this as long as you want. 

  

Michael Williams deliberately withheld this email from the Cambridgeshire Constabulary because it exposes his role as a manipulator of the legal system, not a victim of harassment. His mocking, taunting, and legal threats directly contradict any claim of fear or distress. Instead of being forced into contact, he repeatedly chooses to engage, escalate, and provoke—all while selectively presenting himself as a victim to law enforcement.


By withholding this crucial evidence, Michael deceived police into believing that he was being persistently harassed when, in reality, he was actively participating in—and encouraging—continued conflict. Had the police seen this email, it is highly likely they would have recognized that Michael was never a victim, but rather a strategic legal aggressor, misusing law enforcement to serve his own retaliatory ends.


Email 6: Michael Williams’ Continued Legal Posturing and Willing Engagement—Contradicting His Alleged Fear of Harassment

--------------------------------------------------------------------

This email, which Michael Williams intentionally omitted from his police submissions, once again demonstrates that he was not a victim of harassment but an active and strategic participant in escalating legal conflict. Instead of seeking distance or protection, he initiates legal discussions, demands direct communication, and outlines litigation steps, proving that he was fully engaged in the dispute and not in fear of contact. 


In this email, Michael:


· Demands legal representative’s contact information, showing that he expected and welcomed further engagement.


· Explicitly acknowledges that ongoing communication is necessary, contradicting any claim that he felt distressed by my messages.


· Details his intent to file a demurrer and enforce procedural requirements under CCP § 430.41(a)(2)—indicating a high level of legal involvement and escalation.


· Threatens discovery into personal matters, such as past legal records, DUIs, mental health diagnoses, and other sensitive topics, proving that he was actively seeking to weaponize legal processes against me.


Had Michael truly been in fear or distress, he would have ceased all communication, blocked me, and let legal professionals handle the dispute. Instead, he insists on direct interaction, outlines legal steps, and aggressively pursues personal discovery requests, proving that he was neither avoiding nor fearful of engagement.

  

From: Michael Williams <mgw@ucla.edu>

Date: Friday, 17 November 2023 at 01:02

To: The Author <thauthor@michaelgavinwilliams.com>

Cc: Kirk Rader <kirk@rader.us>, Lyn Ayal <lynayal@gmail.com>, Alex Ayal <alexayal@tutamail.com>, Steve Ayal <steveayal@hotmail.com>, steveayal@gmail.com <steveayal@gmail.com>, Danielle Williams <dewilliams83@gmail.com>

Subject: Re: Critical Clarifications and Moving Towards Legal Resolution


So that means you don't have a lawyer? You keep saying "legal representation" but why won't you tell us who that is? Just say it so it's clear. If you don't have any, say it. You and I will then have to be in very regular contact--we are legally obligated to by the fact that you filed a complaint against me. 


You can say whatever you want about the police report. There's more paperwork on Rand, which we can get into during the long discovery phase of your new lawsuit. But you already know that Rand reported you for theft and fraud (even if you did not have criminal charges filed), so nothing I said about that was false. You've also conceded that nothing I said about DUI and Emma was false. You were arrested for DUI. I didn't say and wouldn't know what you later pled it down to. And "DUI" first came from your mouth--maybe you owe me $300k for that. 


You dispute the context and interpretation of things I said, but not what I actually said. None of us believe that you interpreted literally the metaphors of knifing us and poison. You know a court won't either, even if you can't admit it. None of this is how defamation works and you will have an obligation to correct the false statements you apparently filed in court today.. You will find that, unlike chat gpt, the court system does not operate according to your delusions. 


I have asked you many times for many years to just leave me and my family alone. Your refusal to honor that very simple request is what leads us here. Keep going and you'll find out how crushingly expensive and unpleasant litigation is. 

  

Michael Williams deliberately omitted this email from his police submission because it destroys his narrative of being a passive, unwilling victim of harassment. Rather than attempting to disengage, he actively provokes further interaction, demands direct communication, and threatens invasive legal actions against me. His cold, calculated legal strategy proves that he was not in fear, but rather using the legal system as a weapon to exert control and inflict harm.


By withholding this email, Michael deceived the Cambridgeshire Constabulary into believing that he was being stalked and harassed, when in reality, he was openly inviting continued legal conflict and actively strategizing litigation against me. 


Email 7: Michael Williams’ Continued Engagement and Retaliatory Legal Threats—Further Proof He Is Not a Victim

--------------------------------------------------------------------

This email, which Michael Williams deliberately omitted from his police submissions, further exposes his false victim narrative by demonstrating that he was fully engaged in escalating legal conflict, not avoiding contact out of fear or distress. Instead of cutting off communication, Michael openly acknowledges his intent to continue engaging with me on legal matters and even threatens a cross-complaint—clear evidence that he was not being harassed but actively retaliating.


In this email, Michael:


· Flatly denies requests for resolution ("Requests denied")—demonstrating a refusal to de-escalate rather than an attempt to avoid conflict.


· Confirms his intent to file a legal demurrer, ensuring continued legal interaction.


· Threatens a cross-complaint, proving that he was not merely defending himself but actively seeking legal retaliation.


Had Michael genuinely been in fear or felt harassed, he would have ceased all contact, blocked communication, or sought a protection order through legal channels without engaging further. Instead, he chooses to escalate the dispute, explicitly states his intent to continue legal actions, and ensures ongoing interaction—which is completely at odds with his claim of being an unwilling victim.

  

From: Michael Williams <mgw@ucla.edu>

Subject: Re: Establishing Guidelines for Future Family Communications and Legal Engagement

Date: 17 November 2023 at 01:30:41 GMT

To: The Author <thauthor@michaelgavinwilliams.com>

Cc: Kirk Rader <kirk@rader.us>, Lyn Ayal <lynayal@gmail.com>, Alex Ayal <alexayal@tutamail.com>, Steve Ayal <steveayal@hotmail.com>, "steveayal@gmail.com" <steveayal@gmail.com>, Danielle Williams <dewilliams83@gmail.com>, "danielle.ayal@live.com" <danielle.ayal@live.com>

Requests denied. I will be in touch with you about my demurrer and my cross complaint against you shortly.

  

Michael Williams deliberately withheld this email from his police submissions because it destroys his fabricated narrative of being pursued and harassed against his will. This email proves that he was actively driving the legal conflict forward, not seeking to escape it. By confirming his intention to file legal motions and countersue, Michael shows that he was not a passive victim but an instigator using the legal system as a weapon.


By omitting this crucial piece of evidence, Michael manipulated law enforcement into believing that me was relentlessly pursuing him, when in reality, Michael was fully engaged in retaliatory legal action and ensuring prolonged interaction. Had the Cambridgeshire Constabulary seen this email, they would have recognized Michael’s role as a willing and aggressive participant, not a distressed victim, and likely declined to pursue the Stalking Protection Order application.


Email 8: Michael Williams’ Baseless Criminal Accusations and Legal Intimidation—Contradicting His Claims of Harassment

--------------------------------------------------------------------

This email, which Michael Williams deliberately withheld from his police submissions, is yet another example of his active participation in escalating conflict, making baseless criminal accusations, and weaponizing the legal system to threaten me. Instead of a fearful victim seeking protection, Michael is the aggressor, fabricating a felony accusation against me without evidence and using legal threats to intimidate him.


In this email, Michael:


· Accuses me of felony witness tampering without any proof, demonstrating a clear intent to provoke and escalate legal hostilities.


· Mocks my legal situation ("This is going great for you")—a tone completely inconsistent with someone who feels harassed or intimidated.


· Cites California Penal Code § 136.1, making a thinly veiled threat of criminal prosecution, despite having no grounds for such an allegation.


Had Michael genuinely felt harassed or in distress, he would have ceased communication entirely, refused to engage, or sought legal protection through proper channels. Instead, he continues to provoke conflict, issue legal threats, and falsely accuse me of serious crimes—exposing his true role as an aggressor, not a victim.

  

From: Michael Williams <mgw@ucla.edu>

Subject: Re: Important Family Communication and Request for Respectful Distance

Date: 17 November 2023 at 17:32:36 GMT

To: The Author <thauthor@michaelgavinwilliams.com>

Cc: Kirk Rader <kirk@rader.us>, Lyn Ayal <lynayal@gmail.com>, Alex Ayal <alexayal@tutamail.com>, Steve Ayal <steveayal@hotmail.com>, "steveayal@gmail.com" <steveayal@gmail.com>, Danielle Williams <dewilliams83@gmail.com>

Wait so which former girlfriends did you dissuade from providing evidence in your lawsuit? Are you aware that's a felony in California? This is going great for you. 


136.1. 

(a) Except as provided in subdivision (c), any person who does any of the following is guilty of a public offense and shall be punished by imprisonment in a county jail for not more than one year or in the state prison:


(1) Knowingly and maliciously prevents or dissuades any witness or victim from attending or giving testimony at any trial, proceeding, or inquiry authorized by law.

  

Michael deliberately omitted this email from his police submission because it completely undermines his claim of being harassed or stalked. A person genuinely in fear does not engage in baseless criminal accusations, taunt the alleged harasser, or threaten felony charges with no evidence. Instead, this email proves that Michael was actively instigating legal warfare, misusing the justice system to fabricate criminal claims against me in an attempt to escalate the dispute.


By withholding this email, Michael misled the Cambridgeshire Constabulary into believing that he was an innocent victim of relentless harassment, when in reality, he was launching defamatory accusations, escalating tensions, and using law enforcement as a tool for retaliation. Had the police seen this email, they would have recognized Michael’s bad faith actions, exposed his deceptive legal tactics, and likely dismissed his manipulative abuse of process.


Email 9: Michael Williams’ Continued Engagement in Legal Procedures—Contradicting His Claims of Fear and Harassment

--------------------------------------------------------------------

This email, which Michael Williams deliberately omitted from his police submissions, once again demonstrates that he was not a victim of harassment, but an active and engaged participant in the ongoing legal dispute. Instead of showing distress or avoidance, Michael repeatedly instructs me on proper legal service methods, engages in procedural discussions, and accuses me of bad faith—all while falsely claiming harassment.


In this email, Michael:


· Confirms for the third time his willingness to accept legal service, proving that he was not avoiding contact.


· Directs me to official legal documents to educate him on the process, showing his full engagement rather than fear.


· Accuses me of bad faith for not complying with his preferred method of service, a legal dispute rather than harassment.


· Asserts that seeking his residential address is harassment, despite the fact that address discovery is a standard part of legal proceedings, not a threat.


Had Michael truly felt harassed or in danger, he would have ceased all communication, sought immediate legal protection, or blocked contact. Instead, he actively participated in the process, dictated legal procedures, and falsely framed standard legal inquiries as harassment—proving that his police complaint was based on selective and misleading evidence.

  

From: Michael Williams mgw@ucla.edu

Date: Friday, November 24, 2023 at 4:20 PM

To: The Author thauthor@michaelgavinwilliams.com

Subject: Re: Acknowledgment of Recent Communication

For the third time: I am telling you that I will accept service by mail, at the address I have provided you, with notice and acknowledgment of receipt. Since you do not have legal representation, you may need to do some research to understand that this is a valid method of service. You can start here. https://www.courts.ca.gov/documents/pos015.pdf 

Your continued refusal to attempt service in this valid method, your refusal to explain why you do not think this is a valid method of service, and your continued insistence on discovering where we live, appear to be in bad faith. We also view it as another form of harassment and as a threat to our family, which will form the basis of a civil restraining order against you shortly

  

Michael Williams intentionally omitted this email from his police submission because it proves that he was actively engaging with me on legal matters, contradicting any claim that he was being stalked or harassed. Instead of disengaging, he dictated legal service requirements, falsely accused me of bad faith, and manufactured claims of harassment based on standard legal procedures.


By withholding this email, Michael deceived the Cambridgeshire Constabulary into believing that I was relentlessly pursuing him, when in reality, Michael was a willing participant in legal disputes and was fabricating claims of harassment to manipulate law enforcement. Had the police seen this email, they would have recognized Michael’s deceptive legal tactics and likely dismissed his abuse of process.


Email 10: Michael Williams’ Legal Representation and Willing Engagement—Contradicting His Alleged Fear of Harassment

--------------------------------------------------------------------

This email, which Michael Williams deliberately omitted from his police submissions, further contradicts his claim that he was being relentlessly harassed and in distress. Instead of disengaging, he acknowledges his legal representation, directs legal communications to his attorney, and misrepresents standard legal procedures as harassment.


In this email, Michael:


· Confirms he is represented by counsel and provides legal instructions—a move that indicates strategic legal engagement, not fear or distress.


· Restates that he has accepted legal service, contradicting his claims of avoiding contact.


· Falsely labels further attempts at service as harassment, even though ensuring proper service is a normal legal process, not a criminal act.


· Attempts to control the narrative by shifting communication to his attorney, yet still engaging in the discussion himself.


Had Michael truly been a victim of harassment, he would have ceased all communication, allowed only his attorney to speak on his behalf, or filed a protection order at an earlier stage. Instead, he remained engaged, dictated legal procedures, and selectively framed lawful service of process as harassment—further proving that his claims to law enforcement were strategically misleading.

  

From: Michael Williams <mgw@ucla.edu>

Subject: Re: Legal Update and Notice Regarding Service of Process

Date: 7 December 2023 at 21:29:06 GMT

To: The Author <thauthor@michaelgavinwilliams.com>

Cc: Erin McGahey <esm@darlaw.com>

As I think you already know, I am represented by counsel in this matter, Erin McGahey, copied here. You need to direct these communications to her, not to me. Her firm can also accept service on my behalf, so you need to direct service to them. 

Given that I have already accepted service by notice and acknowledgement, which you have admitted, we understand your further attempts at service to be yet another form of harassment, but you can explain your objections to the notice and acknowledgement to Erin. 

  

Michael deliberately withheld this email from his police submission because it proves that he was not in distress, but rather an active participant in an ongoing legal dispute. Instead of demonstrating fear or avoidance, this email shows that Michael had legal counsel, was in full control of the situation, and knowingly misrepresented a normal legal process as harassment to police.


By withholding this email, Michael deceived the Cambridgeshire Constabulary into believing he was being unlawfully pursued, when in reality, he was fully engaged in legal manoeuvring, directing service procedures, and strategically manipulating law enforcement for retaliatory purposes. Had the police seen this email, they would have recognized Michael’s duplicity and likely dismissed the Stalking Protection Order application as an abuse of the legal system.


The ten emails presented in this letter provide irrefutable evidence that Michael Gavin Williams has deliberately lied through omission and misrepresentation, selectively hiding his active participation in these communications in order to deceive law enforcement and the courts. Instead of being an innocent victim of harassment, Michael is the primary instigator, aggressor, and agent of escalation in this dispute, repeatedly engaging, provoking, and then manipulating the justice system to serve his own retaliatory ends.


Michael feels emboldened in these deceitful actions because of his geographical distance from the United Kingdom, knowing that his false and misleading reports to law enforcement are unlikely to be challenged due to international jurisdictional barriers. He misuses the legal system as a weapon, relying on selective evidence submission to create a false narrative of victimhood, when in reality, he has:


· Repeatedly engaged in legal threats, taunts, and defamation while omitting these provocations from his reports.


· Encouraged continued correspondence, only to hoard responses and manipulate them as "evidence" of alleged harassment.


· Deliberately avoided blocking communication, despite having the ability to do so at any time with a single click, proving his willingness to escalate the conflict rather than stop it.


· Orchestrated real-life retaliatory actions, including defacing my LinkedIn page and instigating my eviction in Cambridge, proving that he was not merely a passive recipient of messages, but a calculated actor seeking to cause harm while feigning victimhood.

The People Michael Has Recruited and Exploited

Michael Gavin Williams Exploits Females for Revenge

Michael Gavin Williams is on a fratricidal campaign of cyberstalking, extortion, blackmail, defamation, and revenge. Michael abuses his legal expertise to manipulate law enforcement and the judicial system, while recruiting them into his cowardly campaign of violence by proxy.


Michael Gavin Williams exploits females, woke liberals, corrupt judges, transgendered activists, and simps in order to amplify and extend the reach of his insane vendetta that knows no limits or bounds. 


In the following sections, I will name each person that has fallen into Michael's fratricidal brainwashing and extreme vendetta. I will describe their role in perpetuating Michael's corruption and pernicious behaviour.

Robyn Wilton

House Host at Locke Living

After cyberstalking me to Turing Locke in Eddington, Cambridge, Michael Gavin Williams recruited Robyn Wilton, an extreme feminist, transgender activist and menstruation guru, into his campaign of fratricidal defamation and revenge.


Robyn Wilton is the founder of Bleed On It, CIC, which is a supper club dedicated to "people with periods." At Bleed On It, CIC supper clubs, Robyn Wilton discusses vaginal bleeding in the context of food preparation, comparing endometrial slough with nutrition and sustenance. Robyn has stated publicly that the serpent emblem in the bottom right hand corner of this image represents "life and death eating itself."


Michael tracked me to Turing Locke in late June 2024. Michael then defamed me to the staff, including Robyn Wilton. As a result, I experienced severe verbal abuse by Robyn Wilton, including denigration of my physical appearance, sexual harassment, defamation and violation of my medical privacy. 


On July 2nd, 2024, after returning from work, I was seated peacefully in the lobby of Turing Locke when Robyn Wilton made the following remarks to me:


1. "Your medication has arrived!"


2. "You should get a tattoo, then you would finally be the coolest guy at work.”


3. "Not everything is so black and white! Transgender people are here and their lives matter!" (In response to my mentioning a tattoo idea related to the Yin Yang symbol).


4. "It's too bad you are not a FEMINIST!!" (In response to my stating my beliefs as a humanist).


5. "You sound really TRANSPHOBIC"


6. "I really don't like your energy right now."


7. "You look really triggered HAHAHAHAHA!" (This was said as I got up to leave).


8. "Rhys, he's THREATENING me!" (In response to my intent to report the incident to her management).


Following this exchange, I approached her manager, Rhys Davies, requesting the contact information for the general manager, Martin Newbould. Rhys Davies informed me that he could not provide this information due to privacy regulations but assured me that he would relay the matter to his manager. 


This was in fact an egregious lie and intentional act of disinformation and misinformation. Martin Newbould's business card is actually on the front desk of Turing Locke, a fact Rhys Davies, Assistant Manager, is well aware of.


As a result of this exchange and the aftermath, I was evicted from Turing Locke by the regional manager, Jamie Mackie.

Rhys Davies

House Host at Locke Living

Rhys Davies was a party to the extreme abuse and sexual harassment of my person by Robyn Wilton on July 2nd, 2024.


Rhys felt emboldened by Michael Gavin Williams to exploit the optics created by Michael's extreme defamation, to indulge in cover-ups and fatuous lies.


When I asked Rhys for his manager's email, Rhys told me a blatant lie, stating, "For privacy reasons we cannot give out our manager's email". Meanwhile, Rhys's manager's business card was available at the front desk of Turing Locke, and it included his email address.


Rhys Davies is a liar.


Not only that, Rhys describes his tattoos a Polynesian symbols. Rhys plans to cover his chest in Polynesian ideograms dedicated to his "partner", which presumably means a female domestic cohabitant, or girlfriend. The word "partner" is virtue signaling woke-speech aimed at neutering biology in the name of communist-style equality.


Apparently Rhys beleives that cultural appropriation and permanent skin markings will spare him from the divorce and divestment scheme aimed at removing the power from left-wing men by strident modern females who deny the biological realities of our sexes. 


Rhys Davies stands for cultural appropriation and woke gender violence.


Finally, Rhys sent me an email accusing me of pilfering tea from a cabinet, attempting to heap petty theft onto his list of defamatory statements, emboldened by Michael Gavin Williams.


Michael Gavin Williams, the fratricidal attorney, encourages mentally unwell individuals such as Rhys Davies to lie and indulge in devilry and satanism.


Rhys Davies was subsequently sacked and rightfully terminated from his role at Locke Living.


Good riddance.

Martin Newbould

General Manager at Locke Living

Martin Newbould was the General Manager at Turing Locke, in Eddington, until his departure as a result of the aftermath of his distorted entanglement with Michael Gavin Williams.


When Michael Gavin Williams contacted Martin Newbould to continue his fratricidal campaign by attempting to have me evicted, he found a sympathetic ear. 


Martin Newbould made no attempt to behave professionally or instruct his staff, including Robyn Wilton and Rhys Davies, to behave professionally in the face of the extreme cyberstalking and defamation of Michael Gavin Williams against my person.


Michael Gavin Williams, an attorney residing in California, attempted to have me evicted from Turing Locke by making defamatory claims and spreading lies and toxic gossip to Martin Newbould and his staff. That is why Robyn Wilton unleashed her extreme psycho-sexual tirade against me in the lobby of Turing Locke on July 2nd, 2024. 


To make matters even more disturbing, when I complained about the behavior of Robyn Wilton to Locke Living, Martin Newbould told me to be quiet and keep it "our little secret." He forbid me from talking to the guest services complaint team. This mirrors the lies and toxic cover-ups orchestrated by Rhys Davies, who lied to me about the privacy of Martin Newbould's email address.


In fact, the Locke Living terms of service states:


"16. Complaints or enquiries.


In the unlikely event that you are dissatisfied with any aspect of your accommodation please notify the general manager/duty manager as soon as possible in the first instance. If you do not give us the opportunity to resolve a problem during your stay, it is impossible to help rectify any issues with your stay. We aim to deliver the best possible customer service, but in the unlikely event that you are dissatisfied with our service, please contact us by email to GuestServices@edyngroup.com."


Martin Newbould is an absolutely abusive and slimy creep.


Martin Newbould physically cornered me in the hallway of the Turing Locke lobby and said to me "You must not talk about this with anyone else, only me. I am sure you understand due to the sensitivity of this matter, that you may not talk to anyone but me about this."


By the "sensitivity of this matter," Martin Newbould apparently meant the fact that he had a covetous relationship with a tattooed cultural appropriator on his staff in addition to an extreme feminist menstruation worshiper, and together, they wielded cancel culture in the Turing Locke lobby under his patriarchal male supervision.


Look at Martin Newbould and ask yourself, does he look like someone you want in charge of your living accommodations? Would you let that brutish thug near your children? 


That is Martin Newbould's WhatsApp profile picture, revealing the true Mr. Hyde to his faux Dr. Jekyll professional appearance at work. 


Martin wants you to know who he really is. 


You should listen.

Erin McGahey

Attorney, Toxic Torts, Demler Armstrong and Rowland

Michael Gavin Williams hired Erin McGahey to obstruct court process after I filed a civil lawsuit against him for defamation. Erin McGahey is a friend of Danielle Williams, the regrettable spouse of Michael Gavin Williams,


Here is the email from Erin McGahey where she instructs me to serve paperwork to a closed office, effectively making the service of summons impossible. Erin McGahey, working from the luxury and comfort of her Northern California home after the covid-19 pandemic, found a snide and slimy way to derail lawsuits—simply instruct opposition to serve her office which was boarded up. 


Erin McGahey, being an expert in the field of toxic tort litigation, knows that she cannot just obstruct justice without a slight of hand and verbal misdirection. Let's read Erin's own words to see how she exploits left-wing weasel words meant to fracture attention and accountability using the infamous "not all" approach:


---------------------------------------------------------

From: Erin McGahey <esm@darlaw.com>
Date: Saturday, December 9, 2023 at 10:15 AM
To: The Author thauthor@michaelgavinwilliams.com

Subject: RE: Address Confirmation and Legal Proceedings Update


Mr. Williams-


I have informed you that Michael Williams is represented by counsel and that all documents are to be served to my office.  Please refrain from having further communications with my client regarding this matter and direct all inquiries to me.  Additionally, do not serve Mr. Williams with any documents at any location, including his home or place of business.   Any attempt to personally serve him with documents will be interpreted as a form of harassment and intimidation.


You can have any documents served electronically at this email.  Also, please include my assistant, Francinny Almeida on your service list with her email alm@darlaw.com.  If you do insist on utilizing a process server, deliver them to my attention at the address below. 


Demler Armstrong & Rowland LLP

101 Montgomery Street, Suite 1800

San Francisco, CA 94104.  


Please be aware that my office is closed and there is not always an individual present to accept service.  Therefore, please serve all documents via email to ensure receipt and proper service.


Thank you for you attention.


ERIN S. McGAHEY | Partner                                                              

DEMLER ARMSTRONG & ROWLAND, LLP 

www.darlaw.com   

101 Montgomery Street, Suite 1800 ▪ San Francisco, CA 94104 

T: 415.949.1900 ▪ Fax: 415.354.8380 ▪ esm@darlaw.com 

--------------------------------------------------------------


Erin McGahey is well aware that email is not an accepted way to serve a summons in California. 


When Erin McGahey states "Please be aware that my office is closed and there is not always an individual present to accept service.", what she means is that there is no one there at all, ever. The truth tends to hit different when you are not a fork tounged serpent obstructing justice on behalf of Michael Gavin Williams.


Erin McGahey will be known as just another strident Northern California feminist that Michael Gavin Williams exploited owing to her gender and to leverage her white-female privilege and feigned outrage. While Erin McGahey may be an expert in toxic torts, her fractious weasel words and obstruction of justice make her a prime example of a toxic tart.

Gregory Saldivar

Subsance Abusing Commissioner and Pandering Simp

This is Gregory Saldivar, a commissioner in the Superior Court of California, Family Law Division.


Please look at this man's face, nose and eyes. He is a drunk and a stoner, showing up to his job under the influence daily. 


Michael Williams hired an attorney with back channel connections to Gregory Saldivar in order to issue a gag order against me from discussing my defamation case against Michael Gavin Williams. Gregory Saldivar was more than happy to oblige, accepting Michael's perjury under oath in order to further defame me. 


It was in the court of Gregory Saldivar that Michael first made the outrageous and false claim of being the victim of a child sex crime, which never happened. The truth is much more humiliating to Michael. When he was 15 years old, Michael allowed a stranger to touch his genitals in exchange for the promise of marijuana. 


Michael apparently thought that lying under oath and committing perjury in the courtroom of a substance abusing commissioner, with a speciality in simping for female restraining orders, would effectively change the public record. Michael was a drug abusing teenager and he did things he regrets. Michael cannot be allowed to perjure himself to rewrite history.


You see, Gregory Saldivar is the kind of putrid, rotten, diabolical satanist sitting on a court bench that is ruining American society. Gregory is issuing restraining orders against hard working men in order to keep them quiet, all while supporting transgendered militants and females who are defrauding their former romantic partners for personal gain. Gregory Saldivar is trash and nothing but a disgusting symptom of modernity and the excesses of the boomer generation.


In the words of Michael Gavin Williams: "Accountability." 


Who is preposterously euphemistic and childishly avoidant now, Michael?

Ellie Hathiramani

A Basic Social Media Narcissist and Detective in Cambridgeshire

This is Ellie Hathiramani, a detective constable in Cambridgeshire. She was recruited by Michael Gavin Williams to join in his campaign of fratricidal legal abuse. She interviewed me, served me papers, and conducted document reviews in support of Michael Gavin Williams without any scrutiny of Michael's perjury and lies.


Let's look at this image of Ellie Hathiramani, which comes from her public social media. We see yet another young modern woman, looking at herself in the reflection of her smartphone, pleased with her temporary endowment of firm reproductive organs and a face like a cupcake full of frosting.


Ellie Hathiramani is an example of how our modern society resembles a female worshipping herself in a smartphone mirror like a golden calf. Yet she is alone, fragmented, and in denial about the nature of her temporary youth and beauty. Her source of self-congratulation is coming to an end sooner than she thinks.


This is what Nick Dean and Cambridgeshire County considers to be a prime ideal of law enforcement. The UK has become a dystopian hellscape lorded over by females obsessed with looking at themselves in an iPhone like MAC Counter zombies sporting pneumatics. 


The UK is in a downward spiral, thanks to the dystopian messaging of marketeers—female and homosexual social justice warriors in London, actively dispensing hatred on the working class. 


Watch this YouTube video for a deeper analysis of the problem and how the British are being lulled to their extermination by narcissistic middle class females sitting arrogantly upon artificially high places.


British Ads Are Dystopian Propaganda

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=26mLdpZWwpY

Emma Joy Nie: Liar, False Accuser, Perjurer, Trans Extremist

Emma Confessed to Hurting Me

Emma Advertises Her 304 Phases

Michael Gavin Williams claims that I hurt Emma, but Michael is a liberal democrat, and as such, he states the opposite of the truth in order to create confusion and sanction his defamation. In fact, Emma has apoligized for the opposite, hurting me by making false accusations while under the influence of multiple drugs.

Emma Advertises Her 304 Phases

Emma Advertises Her 304 Phases

Emma maintains the Instagram account  @poppy_the_corgi a presumably innocent animal account devoted to her charming fluffy corgi, Poppy, a vegan dog with a bright personality and a love of beach walkies. However, Emma uses the charming nature of Poppy to disseminate her dark side, a modern, abortion obsessed, sexually promiscuous, gender violent, libertine sex addict. 

Emma is a Demonic Child Abuser

Emma is a Demonic Child Abuser

Emma uses her charming dog's instagram account to disseminate satanic messages powered by the LGBTQIA+ movement. In this public Instagram story, Emma advertises her nature as a demonic force, in high heels, pitch fork in hand, dispensing rainbows. Emma is a preschool director at Bright Horizons Preschool in San Jose, California. Her Instagram account is public and aimed at children.

Emma is a Deviant Liar

Emma is a Demonic Child Abuser

In this Instagram story, Emma boasts about hurting me, in which she made a suprise reveal, she was never a straight woman, she was only pretending, which alll the time being secretly queer as hell. SURPRISE BITCH Indeed. Emma decided to abscond with my propery by filing a false police report and stealing over $100,000 of assets and investment from me on November 19, 2020. 

Emma is a Violent Trans Extremist

In this post on Poppy the Corgi's Instagram, Emma advertises her new man, who is in fact a women, as in an adult human female. The Handy Ande, a heavy petting savant, is a female taking testosterone injections to grow facial hair and a muscular physique, while possessing a vagina. Emma is a fervent proponent of vivisection and elective body modification to evade legal classifications. Go Giants.

Emma is a Pansexual Narcissist

In this self-aggrandizing post, Emma shares how virtuous she is because of her mask usage and the fact that she votes. However, Emma allowed strangers into her home during the pandemic without a mask on and with anti-vaccination ideology. Emma does not stop there, she hashtags #pansexual #badass, because her political messages must always include her debauchery and sexual messaging towards children.

Nick Dean - Personal Simp for Michael Gavin Williams

Chief Constable of Cambridgeshire - Telling Lies on Record

Nick Dean is the Chief Constable of Cambridgeshire. This rotund authoritarian has taken up the feigned victimhood of Michael Gavin Williams as his personal crucible, one upon which he is willing to jeopardize his word, integrity, career and personal respect. 


Nick Dean has submitted the following false information into the public record of the Huntingdon civil courts:


  • [The Author] sends in excess of 300 emails a day to the victim.


  • [The Author] repeatedly refers to Michael as “Michael penis-fondle”


  • Michael Williams' address is located at 2110 Oakmont Drive, San Bruno, California, CA 94066, USA.


Nick Dean is the personal white knight savior and simp for Michael Gavin Williams. Nick Dean is just another activist authoritarian in the United Kingdom, policing speech, imposing two-tier justice, hiding evidence, selectively hearing what he wants, and selectively blinding himself to "inconvenient" counter evidence based on his personal feelings. I would say this man has no heart, but sadly, it seems he is more of a coronary attack waiting to happen. A ticking time bomb of over-eating and double think.


Nick Dean has stated that his decision to ignore Michael's provocative emails, cyberstalking, and legal abuses is fueled by Nick Dean's desire to protect Benjamin Grant Williams, Michael's offspring, from learning about this event in the future and tarnishing his father, Michael, in his son's eyes. Thus, Nick Dean has publicly stated that having children is a reason to ignore crimes, while being single and without children is an aggravating factor against my person.


In the words of one of my friends, Cambridgeshire police are bored; If this was the London MET police, they would not even have time to take Michael's phone calls. Thus, Nick Dean, activist twat, is looking to take up private, international, and personal family matters as his mantle of justice.


Nick Dean is further evidence that the United Kingdom is in a downward spiral to becoming a third world sewer of cold weather and Orwellian bureaucracy. Without colonialism, the United Kingdom has nothing to offer except drama, corruption, and the lies of "little satan."


Nick Dean, please print out this website, roll it up, light in on fire, and deposit it in your rectum, you dirty hog, you.

Hollie Jordan-Wright

An Obese Expression of Misandry and Legal Abuse

My mother always told me that inside every fat person lives an angry person.


This description is abundantly accurate for Hollie Jordan-Wright, an attorney working for Howard Kennedy LLP. 


Hollie Jordan-Wright is hired muscle, or rather hired blubber, on behalf of Locke Living. 


In response to my complaints about the extreme sexual harassment and gender violent verbal abuse hurled at me publicly by Robyn Wilton, Hollie Jordan-Wright stated by email:


"The various allegations of harassment and abuse made in your communications are denied."


Presumably the corpulent lies of Hollie Jordan-Wright serve as a form of therapy for her after a lifetime of indulgence, over-eating, ridicule and identitarian grumpiness.


Hollie Jordan-Wright, a British authoritarian twat, believes that misandry and denying the abuses hurled at males by females will make the world a better place. 


Her portly abuse of legal double speak and British Orwellian serpentism just goes to show that her porcine trotters have no place holding a pen.


Even that innocent modern orange chair is in clear and present danger from her station.

Glenna Smith Conley / Glenna Jean Smith

Extreme Sexual Deviant and Entitled Demonic Abuser

This is Glenna Jean Smith also known as Glenna Smith Conley. Regrettably, I dated this sexually deviant monster in my college years.


On our first date, Glenna brought her then boyfriend and live-in sex slave, Jeremy Avnet, along with her to the movie theatre. Jeremy Avnet is from the same family in Hollywood associated with Jon Avnet. Glenna introduced Jeremy as her housemate who wanted to see the same movie and had thus carpooled with her. However, this was far from the truth and the truth was far more sinister.


Glenna was punishing Jeremy by forcing him to watch and observe her enact her perverted open relationships. She went on dates and had sex with men in the room next to Jeremy, where she forced Jeremy listen to her have loud and animated sex with other men. 


Jeremy loved Glenna, and she took that opportunity to psychologically terrorize him. Glenna gave Jeremy a mandate, watch her have sex with other men, or lose her forever.


I did not know about this for about 6-8 months, when Glenna finally told me that she had been having sex with Jeremy during the entire time Glenna was my girlfriend, lying about our committed status. During this time, Glenna was also having sex and engaging in eyeball licking with professors at UC Santa Cruz. Glenna said that having sex with Jeremy was like getting a hug after a long day. 


Glenna stated that she felt entitled to hurt as many men as possible owing to her strict Catholic upbringing, where she was forced to wear Catholic school girl's uniforms to school.


Michael Gavin Williams invited Glenna Jean Smith to Sykes Hot Springs in Big Sur, where they engaged in hallucinogens and sexual intercourse. Michael Gavin Williams has not only been cyberstalking me and attempting to ruin my life for decades, he has also been luring my former romantic partners into having sex with him by offering them drugs. 


Michael Gavin Williams is a sick and demented sexual deviant who boasts about having anal sex and threesomes with his regrettable wife, Danielle Bromberg. Danielle Bromberg is a drug abusing pothead who has smoked over 5 bowls of cannabis per day for decades.

Carrie Page Marder

Drug Addled Doctor and Putrid Feminist

This is Carrie Page Marder. That is the "Carrie" that Michael Williams mentioned in his defamatory and fratricidal tirade. 


Unfortunately, I dated this evil physician when I was in 23 years old. At that time, Carrie Page Marder was a medical student at the UCLA David Geffen Medical School. Her lamentable, arrogant, fatuous father, Victor Marder, was a head of medicine at UCLA as well. 


https://senate.universityofcalifornia.edu/_files/inmemoriam/html/VictorMarder.html


Carrie made her career by leveraging patriarchal nepotism and Jewish insider "tribe" preferences for ethno-religious bias and exclusivity.


Carrie Marder is a drug addict and a drug thief. She spends nearly everyday medicated on amphetamines, opiates, benzodiazepines, marijuana and alcohol. She prescribes herself drugs. She's like a Jewish female version of Dr. Gregory House.


On several occasions, I witnessed her bringing home ill-gotten drugs from UCLA Medical School,. When I said something about it to her, specifically that I was not ok being complicit with drug related felonies, she called her father for help who in turn started legal abuse against me. This is what Michael Gavin Williams means by "restraining orders"—hyper feministic legal abuse, leveraging court bias in favor of demonic women, while issuing gag orders against the truth being known.


Michael Gavin Williams was well-aware of Carrie's drug related crimes. Michael Gavin Williams benefitted from them as well. Once again, we see that Michael Gavin Williams is stalking and surreptitiously courting my former romantic partners for the purposes of hoarding drugs while building his cache of regrettable moments in my life.


I have never had any restraining orders against me, until Michael "penis-fondle" Williams perjured himself in the court of the slime ball, woke commissioner, Gregory Saldivar.


Today, Carrie is a radiologist in Arizona, where she pilfers drugs under the cover of X-rays. 


https://find-doctor.ama-assn.org/doctor/carrie-page-marder-md/15052163


Oh and one more thing, that is her ridiculous cuck of a husband, Michael Marder, on the left in the above picture. If you have been paying attention, you will realize he took her last name. 


He is a bartender in Arizona, and Carrie is thankful she now has hand-crafted, gourmet drinks to get her drunk every day, made by her loser beta cuck of a husband.


Michael Gavin Williams could have made peace and let sleeping dogs lie, but he cannot control himself, so here we are.

Jennifer Tejada

Tone Deaf CEO and Complicit Cyberstalker

This is Jennifer Tejada, the tone deaf CEO of PagerDuty, where Michael Williams works.


I have written tens of emails to Jennifer requesting a cease and desist against her in-house counsel, Michel Gavin Williams, who has been cyberstalking me for years. Michael Williams, in-house counsel at PagerDuty, has been sabotaging my employment and housing in his fratricidal, baby Mikey "penis-fondle" rage madness.


But alas, Jennifer does not seem to care. Today, Michael Gavin Williams continues to work at PagerDuty as in-house counsel, despite obvious evidence that he has been cyberstalking me.


But what else to you expect from a tone deaf CEO who compares herself to Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.?


‘Tone deaf’ PagerDuty CEO Jennifer Tejada ripped for quoting MLK in layoffs memo

-------------------------------

https://nypost.com/2023/01/27/pagerduty-ceo-jennifer-tejada-quotes-mlk-in-layoffs-memo/


The head of a San Francisco-based cloud computing company was widely mocked on social media when she sent an email to employees announcing layoffs while quoting the late Martin Luther King Jr.


Jennifer Tejada, the CEO of PagerDuty, was blasted for being “tone-deaf” after she sent a lengthy, 1,669-word email to her employees announcing that the company would be “refining” its business structure by slashing 7% of its global workforce.


Tejada ended the memo with a quote from a sermon delivered by King, which was later included in the 1959 book “The Measure of a Man.”


“I am reminded in moments like this, of something Martin Luther King said, that ‘the ultimate measure of a [leader] is not where [they] stand in the moments of comfort and convenience, but where [they] stand in times of challenge and controversy,’” Tejada wrote.

-------------------------------


Michael "penis-fondle" Williams works at a cloud computing IT pager notification company, reporting to a narcissistic tone deaf multi-millionaire, who compares herself to civil rights legends as a way to cope with her own poor planning during the "plandemic". 


FFS, toxic much Jennifer?

Michael Gavin Williams is a Demonic and Malicious Coward

The Exploits of a Petty Criminal Obsessed with Hatred

Here is another telling portrait of Michael Gavin Williams.


Michael is full of hate and rage, a petty, petulant, diminutive, narcissistic cowardly clown. Michael Gavin Williams has been cyberstalking me for over 20 years. He is obsessed with killing me, his brother, but not with his own hands. Rather Michael is attempting to murder me by exploiting law enforcement, woke AWFL females, abuse of courts, and secretive operations to defame me in the eyes of everyone I know.


Michael Gavin Williams is a regrettable, putrid, cowardly snake, attempting to induce and cause severe harm through proxies, including freelancers and fake email addresses such as those hosted by ProtonMail.


This is Michael's telling portrait for his previous employer, Openwater Inc.


https://www.openwater.health/

Michael Gavin Williams Embraces Zionism and Racism for Money

This Conflict is Also About Michael's Racism and Greed

This is the home of Michael Gavin Williams and his regrettable pot headed wife, Danielle Bromberg.


This is a high-end, expensive home in the hills of Northern California, in Silicon Valley, near San Francisco. Michael Gavin Williams acquired this property in large part through financial support from his mother, Lyn Ayal.


Lyn Ayal is a radical Zionist, with a fervent, militant and strident conviction that Jews are genetically superior to all other people of all other races, ethnicities and creeds. 


On October 10th, 2023, Lyn Ayal wrote me an email, asking me to support the slaughter of innocent women and children in Gaza by the IDF and settlers, when she said:


"From: Lyn Ayal <lynayal@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2023 8:16:17 PM
To: The Author <theauthor@michaelgavinwilliams.com>
Subject: Gray, not black and white


I understand that women and children are suffering in Gaza, and my heart bleeds, but no less for the Israelis who have tried, historically, to be good neighbors and are now watching videos of Hamas raping Jewish girls and women on piles of dead Jews."


Michael Gavin Williams often states that the way to benefit from Lyn Ayal financially is to take her side in politics, which he does. He said:


"If you make her feel like you are on her side, then Mom will help you."


Danielle Bromberg, the polyamorous, sodomite, Zionist, pot headed wife of Michael Gavin Williams once gave a speech at a family event where she declared:


"I just feel better around Jewish people"


Presumably this was artifice to engender homophilic, ethno-racial support from Lyn Ayal, hence earning them a free house in the hills of the Bay Area.


Lyn Ayal, our mother, divorced our father, a successful corporate litigation attorney, the moment he got sick. In their divorce proceedings, she stated:


"I never loved you Ben, I just knew you'd be a good provider"


Then she took half of everything and left him to die alone. 


Gold digging Zionists are a rare breed to behold,.


#FreePalestine

Michael Gavin Williams

Copyright © 2025 Michael Gavin Williams - All Rights Reserved.

Powered by

This website uses cookies.

We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.

DeclineAccept